RRunyard Index
Runyard / GPU Index / Compare / RTX 4090 vs RTX A6000
NVIDIANVIDIA
Rental price comparison

RTX 4090 vs RTX A6000

The RTX A6000 rents for 7% less per hour today — $0.56 against $0.60 — with 48 GB against 24 GB of memory.

Prices collected 2026-09-18 · 8 providers price both

RTX 4090RTX A6000
$0.00$0.25$0.50$0.75$1.00Sep 12Sep 14Sep 16Sep 18

Index median per GPU-hour, on-demand, per snapshot.

Side by side

RTX 4090RTX A6000
Median rental, per GPU-hour$0.60$0.56
Cheapest listing$0.30$0.33
Per month at 720 h$432$403
Providers pricing it1316
Memory24 GB GDDR6X48 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth1,008 GB/s768 GB/s
GB of memory per $/hr40.085.7
ArchitectureAda LovelaceAmpere
ClassConsumerWorkstation
Released2022-102020-10

Same provider, both GPUs

The cleanest comparison: 8 providers price both cards, so the difference is the GPU and nothing else. The RTX 4090 is cheaper at 2 of them.

ProviderRTX 4090RTX A6000RTX A6000 premium
io.net$0.30$0.49+65%
RunPod Community Cloud$0.34$0.33-3%
GPU.ai$0.60$0.44-27%
Oblivus$0.64$0.80+25%
Runcrate$0.66$0.55-17%
Beam$0.69$0.54-22%
Vast.ai$0.72$0.60-16%
RunPod Secure Cloud$0.74$0.53-28%

What each one runs, and what a million tokens costs

Weights + KV cache at 8K context + overhead against 90% of each card's memory. Where a model needs more than one card the cell says how many and prices the set at today's median. $/M tokens is the hourly median divided by estimated single-stream output, from memory bandwidth — an estimate for ranking, not a benchmark.

ModelBitsRTX 4090RTX A6000
Kimi K34-bit74× GPU$44.40/hr37× GPU$20.72/hr
Kimi K316-bit260× GPU$156.00/hr130× GPU$72.80/hr
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash4-bit15× GPU$9.00/hr8× GPU$4.48/hr
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash16-bit52× GPU$31.20/hr26× GPU$14.56/hr
Llama 4 Maverick4-bit11× GPU$6.60/hr6× GPU$3.36/hr
Llama 4 Maverick16-bit38× GPU$22.80/hr19× GPU$10.64/hr
gpt-oss-120b4-bit4× GPU$2.40/hr2× GPU$1.12/hr
gpt-oss-120b16-bit11× GPU$6.60/hr6× GPU$3.36/hr
Llama 3.1 70B4-bit3× GPU$1.80/hr2× GPU$1.12/hr
Llama 3.1 70B16-bit7× GPU$4.20/hr4× GPU$2.24/hr
Gemma 4 31B4-bit21.2 GB~46 tok/s · $3.62/M21.2 GB~35 tok/s · $4.44/M
Gemma 4 31B16-bit4× GPU$2.40/hr2× GPU$1.12/hr
Qwen3 Coder 30B-A3B4-bit19 GB~434 tok/s · $0.38/M19 GB~331 tok/s · $0.47/M
Qwen3 Coder 30B-A3B16-bit3× GPU$1.80/hr2× GPU$1.12/hr
Qwen3.8 27B4-bit18.7 GB~53 tok/s · $3.14/M18.7 GB~40 tok/s · $3.89/M
Qwen3.8 27B16-bit3× GPU$1.80/hr2× GPU$1.12/hr
gpt-oss-20b4-bit13.7 GB~398 tok/s · $0.42/M13.7 GB~303 tok/s · $0.51/M
gpt-oss-20b16-bit3× GPU$1.80/hr2× GPU$1.12/hr
Llama 3.1 8B4-bit6.9 GB~179 tok/s · $0.93/M6.9 GB~137 tok/s · $1.14/M
Llama 3.1 8B16-bit18.4 GB~50 tok/s · $3.33/M18.4 GB~38 tok/s · $4.09/M

Buy or rent?

Hours of renting at today's median that add up to the card's approximate list price. List prices are typical quoted figures, not tracked, and do not include the server, power or the person to run it — so the break-even is a floor, not a verdict.

RTX 4090
2,665 h≈ 3.7 months at ~$1,599 list
RTX A6000
8,036 h≈ 11.2 months at ~$4,500 list

Questions

Is the RTX 4090 or the RTX A6000 cheaper to rent?

On 2026-09-18 the RTX 4090 has a market median of $0.60 per GPU-hour across 13 providers and the RTX A6000 $0.56 across 16, so the RTX A6000 is 7% cheaper per hour. Among the 8 providers that price both, the RTX 4090 is cheaper at 2 and the RTX A6000 at 6. Per hour is only half the answer — the table below prices a whole model on each.

Which should I rent for a 70B model?

At 4-bit, Llama 3.1 70B needs about 44.5 GB. On the RTX 4090 that is 3 cards at $1.80/hr; on the RTX A6000 2 cards at $1.12/hr.

What is the real difference between them?

24 GB GDDR6X at 1,008 GB/s (Ada Lovelace) against 48 GB GDDR6 at 768 GB/s (Ampere). Memory decides what fits; bandwidth decides how fast it generates, because each token streams the active weights once. Compute matters for prompt processing and training, not for how fast text appears.

See every provider's price for either card.
RTX A6000 providers →