Massed Compute vs Vast.ai
11 GPUs in common. Massed Compute is cheaper on 4, Vast.ai on 7; on average Vast.ai is 0% below Massed Compute.
Prices collected 2026-10-11
Every GPU both price
| GPU | Massed Compute | Vast.ai | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 NVIDIA B300 | $6.60 | $9.94 | Massed Compute −34% | $8.00 |
| NVIDIA B200 | $5.43 | $7.50 | Massed Compute −28% | $6.99 |
| NVIDIA H200 NVL | $3.72 | $4.20 | Massed Compute −11% | $3.79 |
| NVIDIA H100 NVL | $3.02 | $2.40 | Vast.ai −20% | $2.80 |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM | $2.94 | $6.15 | Massed Compute −52% | $3.50 |
| NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell | $2.19 | $1.45 | Vast.ai −34% | $2.23 |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $1.37 | $0.93 | Vast.ai −32% | $1.79 |
| NVIDIA L40S | $0.97 | $0.80 | Vast.ai −17% | $1.29 |
| NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada | $0.79 | $0.54 | Vast.ai −32% | $0.89 |
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 | $0.57 | $0.40 | Vast.ai −29% | $0.58 |
| NVIDIA RTX A5000 | $0.44 | $0.23 | Vast.ai −47% | $0.26 |
Only one of them has it
Questions
Is Massed Compute or Vast.ai cheaper?
On the 11 GPUs both price on 2026-10-11, Massed Compute is cheaper on 4 and Vast.ai on 7. On average Vast.ai is 0% cheaper than Massed Compute across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
What does one have that the other does not?
Massed Compute alone prices L40; Vast.ai alone prices H200, H100 PCIe, RTX 5090, RTX 4090, A40, RTX 5080, L4, RTX 4080, RTX 3090, V100 16GB, RTX A4000. They are different kinds of provider — Massed Compute is a neocloud, Vast.ai a marketplace — which is most of why the prices differ.
Where do these prices come from?
Massed Compute: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Vast.ai: Public offer search, verified and rentable hosts only. Each offer is one observation; on-demand rate, not interruptible bids. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.