10 GPUs in common. io.net is cheaper on 7, Massed Compute on 3; on average Massed Compute is 17% above io.net.
Prices collected 2026-10-11
| GPU | io.net | Massed Compute | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $4.89 | $5.43 | io.net −10% | $6.99 | |
| $4.50 | $6.60 | io.net −32% | $8.00 | |
| $3.87 | $2.94 | Massed Compute −24% | $3.50 | |
| $2.44 | $2.19 | Massed Compute −10% | $2.23 | |
| $1.60 | $0.79 | Massed Compute −51% | $0.89 | |
| $1.31 | $1.37 | io.net −4% | $1.79 | |
| $0.84 | $0.97 | io.net −13% | $1.29 | |
| $0.66 | $0.86 | io.net −23% | $0.88 | |
| $0.49 | $0.57 | io.net −13% | $0.58 | |
| $0.19 | $0.44 | io.net −57% | $0.26 |
On the 10 GPUs both price on 2026-10-11, io.net is cheaper on 7 and Massed Compute on 3. On average Massed Compute is 17% more expensive than io.net across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
io.net alone prices V100 32GB, H200, H100 PCIe, A40, L4, A100 40GB, RTX 5090, T4, RTX 4090, RTX 3090, V100 16GB, RTX A4000; Massed Compute alone prices H200 NVL, H100 NVL. They are different kinds of provider — io.net is a marketplace, Massed Compute a neocloud — which is most of why the prices differ.
io.net: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Massed Compute: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.