10 GPUs in common. io.net is cheaper on 7, Massed Compute on 3; on average Massed Compute is 20% above io.net.
Prices collected 2026-09-18
| GPU | io.net | Massed Compute | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $4.89 | $5.43 | io.net −10% | $6.59 | |
| $4.50 | $6.60 | io.net −32% | $7.85 | |
| $3.76 | $2.81 | Massed Compute −25% | $3.50 | |
| $2.24 | $2.19 | Massed Compute −2% | $2.05 | |
| $1.31 | $1.37 | io.net −4% | $1.79 | |
| $1.02 | $0.79 | Massed Compute −23% | $0.82 | |
| $0.89 | $0.97 | io.net −8% | $1.47 | |
| $0.66 | $0.86 | io.net −23% | $0.86 | |
| $0.49 | $0.57 | io.net −13% | $0.56 | |
| $0.19 | $0.44 | io.net −57% | $0.27 |
On the 10 GPUs both price on 2026-09-18, io.net is cheaper on 7 and Massed Compute on 3. On average Massed Compute is 20% more expensive than io.net across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
io.net alone prices H200, V100 32GB, H100 PCIe, A40, A100 40GB, L4, RTX 5090, T4, RTX 4090, RTX 3090, RTX A4000; Massed Compute alone prices H200 NVL, H100 NVL. They are different kinds of provider — io.net is a marketplace, Massed Compute a neocloud — which is most of why the prices differ.
io.net: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Massed Compute: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.