22 GPUs in common. GPU.ai is cheaper on 19, RunPod Secure Cloud on 1; on average RunPod Secure Cloud is 49% above GPU.ai.
Prices collected 2026-10-11
| GPU | GPU.ai | RunPod Secure Cloud | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $8.99 | $8.99 | same | $8.00 | |
| $7.56 | $7.99 | GPU.ai −5% | $6.99 | |
| $4.44 | $5.29 | GPU.ai −16% | $4.50 | |
| $4.14 | $3.79 | RunPod Secure Cloud −8% | $3.79 | |
| $3.73 | $3.99 | GPU.ai −7% | $3.50 | |
| $2.29 | $2.89 | GPU.ai −21% | $2.29 | |
| $2.23 | $3.19 | GPU.ai −30% | $2.80 | |
| $1.84 | $2.54 | GPU.ai −28% | $2.23 | |
| $1.16 | $1.79 | GPU.ai −35% | $1.79 | |
| $0.83 | $1.19 | GPU.ai −30% | $0.81 | |
| $0.78 | $0.82 | GPU.ai −5% | $0.88 | |
| $0.70 | $1.09 | GPU.ai −36% | $1.29 | |
| $0.65 | $0.99 | GPU.ai −34% | $0.89 | |
| $0.62 | $0.89 | GPU.ai −31% | $0.48 | |
| $0.59 | $0.59 | same | $0.59 | |
| $0.46 | $0.59 | GPU.ai −22% | $0.79 | |
| $0.40 | $0.59 | GPU.ai −32% | $0.58 | |
| $0.27 | $0.50 | GPU.ai −46% | $0.27 | |
| $0.24 | $0.59 | GPU.ai −59% | $0.38 | |
| $0.24 | $0.27 | GPU.ai −11% | $0.26 | |
| $0.14 | $0.50 | GPU.ai −72% | $0.22 | |
| $0.12 | $0.25 | GPU.ai −52% | $0.16 |
On the 22 GPUs both price on 2026-10-11, GPU.ai is cheaper on 19 and RunPod Secure Cloud on 1, with 2 tied. On average RunPod Secure Cloud is 49% more expensive than GPU.ai across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
GPU.ai alone prices nothing the other lacks; RunPod Secure Cloud alone prices MI300X. They are different kinds of provider — GPU.ai is a marketplace, RunPod Secure Cloud a neocloud — which is most of why the prices differ.
GPU.ai: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. RunPod Secure Cloud: Public GPU-type listing. Secure Cloud is RunPod's own datacentre capacity, quoted per GPU-hour. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.