Cerebrium vs DataCrunch (Verda)
7 GPUs in common. Cerebrium is cheaper on 3, DataCrunch (Verda) on 4; on average DataCrunch (Verda) is 4% above Cerebrium.
Prices collected 2026-10-11
Every GPU both price
| GPU | Cerebrium | DataCrunch (Verda) | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 NVIDIA B200 | $6.01 | $7.94 | Cerebrium −24% | $6.99 |
| NVIDIA H200 | $4.20 | $5.49 | Cerebrium −24% | $4.50 |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM | $3.40 | $4.21 | Cerebrium −19% | $3.50 |
| NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell | $2.50 | $2.26 | DataCrunch (Verda) −10% | $2.23 |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $2.10 | $1.93 | DataCrunch (Verda) −8% | $1.79 |
| NVIDIA A100 40GB | $2.00 | $1.40 | DataCrunch (Verda) −30% | $1.82 |
| NVIDIA L40S | $1.95 | $1.74 | DataCrunch (Verda) −11% | $1.29 |
Only one of them has it
Questions
Is Cerebrium or DataCrunch (Verda) cheaper?
On the 7 GPUs both price on 2026-10-11, Cerebrium is cheaper on 3 and DataCrunch (Verda) on 4. On average DataCrunch (Verda) is 4% more expensive than Cerebrium across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
What does one have that the other does not?
Cerebrium alone prices A10, L4, T4; DataCrunch (Verda) alone prices B300, RTX 6000 Ada, RTX A6000, V100 16GB.
Where do these prices come from?
Cerebrium: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. DataCrunch (Verda): Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.