Beam vs io.net
10 GPUs in common. Beam is cheaper on 5, io.net on 5; on average io.net is 15% above Beam.
Prices collected 2026-09-18
Every GPU both price
| GPU | Beam | io.net | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 NVIDIA B200 | $4.11 | $4.89 | Beam −16% | $6.59 |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM | $3.50 | $3.76 | Beam −7% | $3.50 |
| NVIDIA H200 | $2.09 | $3.79 | Beam −45% | $4.45 |
| NVIDIA H100 PCIe | $1.83 | $1.59 | io.net −13% | $2.88 |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $1.36 | $1.31 | io.net −4% | $1.79 |
| NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell | $1.09 | $2.24 | Beam −51% | $2.05 |
| NVIDIA RTX 5090 | $0.91 | $0.89 | io.net −2% | $0.69 |
| NVIDIA L40S | $0.76 | $0.89 | Beam −15% | $1.47 |
| NVIDIA RTX 4090 | $0.69 | $0.30 | io.net −57% | $0.60 |
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 | $0.54 | $0.49 | io.net −8% | $0.56 |
Only one of them has it
Questions
Is Beam or io.net cheaper?
On the 10 GPUs both price on 2026-09-18, Beam is cheaper on 5 and io.net on 5. On average io.net is 15% more expensive than Beam across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
What does one have that the other does not?
Beam alone prices nothing the other lacks; io.net alone prices B300, V100 32GB, A40, A100 40GB, L4, RTX 6000 Ada, L40, T4, RTX 3090, RTX A5000, RTX A4000. They are different kinds of provider — Beam is a neocloud, io.net a marketplace — which is most of why the prices differ.
Where do these prices come from?
Beam: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. io.net: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.