Beam vs DataCrunch (Verda)
7 GPUs in common. Beam is cheaper on 7, DataCrunch (Verda) on 0; on average DataCrunch (Verda) is 83% above Beam.
Prices collected 2026-10-11
Every GPU both price
| GPU | Beam | DataCrunch (Verda) | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 NVIDIA B200 | $4.11 | $7.94 | Beam −48% | $6.99 |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM | $3.50 | $4.21 | Beam −17% | $3.50 |
| NVIDIA H200 | $2.09 | $5.49 | Beam −62% | $4.50 |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $1.36 | $1.93 | Beam −30% | $1.79 |
| NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell | $1.09 | $2.26 | Beam −52% | $2.23 |
| NVIDIA L40S | $0.76 | $1.74 | Beam −56% | $1.29 |
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 | $0.54 | $0.71 | Beam −24% | $0.58 |
Only one of them has it
Questions
Is Beam or DataCrunch (Verda) cheaper?
On the 7 GPUs both price on 2026-10-11, Beam is cheaper on 7 and DataCrunch (Verda) on 0. On average DataCrunch (Verda) is 83% more expensive than Beam across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
What does one have that the other does not?
Beam alone prices H100 PCIe, RTX 5090, RTX 4090; DataCrunch (Verda) alone prices B300, A100 40GB, RTX 6000 Ada, V100 16GB.
Where do these prices come from?
Beam: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. DataCrunch (Verda): Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.