Amazon Web Services vs io.net
9 GPUs in common. Amazon Web Services is cheaper on 0, io.net on 9; on average io.net is 54% below Amazon Web Services.
Prices collected 2026-09-18
Every GPU both price
| GPU | Amazon Web Services | io.net | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 NVIDIA B200 | $14.24 | $4.89 | io.net −66% | $6.59 |
| NVIDIA H200 | $7.91 | $3.79 | io.net −52% | $4.45 |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM | $6.88 | $3.76 | io.net −45% | $3.50 |
| NVIDIA V100 32GB | $3.90 | $2.05 | io.net −48% | $2.66 |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $3.43 | $1.31 | io.net −62% | $1.79 |
| NVIDIA L40S | $3.39 | $0.89 | io.net −74% | $1.47 |
| NVIDIA A100 40GB | $2.74 | $1.19 | io.net −57% | $1.48 |
| NVIDIA L4 | $1.60 | $1.05 | io.net −35% | $0.80 |
| NVIDIA T4 | $0.98 | $0.47 | io.net −52% | $0.59 |
Only one of them has it
Questions
Is Amazon Web Services or io.net cheaper?
On the 9 GPUs both price on 2026-09-18, Amazon Web Services is cheaper on 0 and io.net on 9. On average io.net is 54% cheaper than Amazon Web Services across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
What does one have that the other does not?
Amazon Web Services alone prices V100 16GB, A10G; io.net alone prices B300, RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, H100 PCIe, A40, RTX 6000 Ada, RTX 5090, L40, RTX A6000, RTX 4090, RTX 3090, RTX A5000, RTX A4000. They are different kinds of provider — Amazon Web Services is a hyperscaler, io.net a marketplace — which is most of why the prices differ.
Where do these prices come from?
Amazon Web Services: Public on-demand price list for Linux, us-east-1. Instance price divided by GPU count. io.net: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.