Amazon Web Services vs DataCrunch (Verda)
7 GPUs in common. Amazon Web Services is cheaper on 0, DataCrunch (Verda) on 7; on average DataCrunch (Verda) is 50% below Amazon Web Services.
Prices collected 2026-10-11
Every GPU both price
| GPU | Amazon Web Services | DataCrunch (Verda) | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 NVIDIA B200 | $14.24 | $7.94 | DataCrunch (Verda) −44% | $6.99 |
| NVIDIA H200 | $7.91 | $5.49 | DataCrunch (Verda) −31% | $4.50 |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM | $6.88 | $4.21 | DataCrunch (Verda) −39% | $3.50 |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $3.43 | $1.93 | DataCrunch (Verda) −44% | $1.79 |
| NVIDIA L40S | $3.39 | $1.74 | DataCrunch (Verda) −49% | $1.29 |
| NVIDIA V100 16GB | $3.06 | $0.21 | DataCrunch (Verda) −93% | $0.78 |
| NVIDIA A100 40GB | $2.74 | $1.40 | DataCrunch (Verda) −49% | $1.82 |
Only one of them has it
Questions
Is Amazon Web Services or DataCrunch (Verda) cheaper?
On the 7 GPUs both price on 2026-10-11, Amazon Web Services is cheaper on 0 and DataCrunch (Verda) on 7. On average DataCrunch (Verda) is 50% cheaper than Amazon Web Services across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
What does one have that the other does not?
Amazon Web Services alone prices V100 32GB, A10G, L4, T4; DataCrunch (Verda) alone prices B300, RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, RTX 6000 Ada, RTX A6000. They are different kinds of provider — Amazon Web Services is a hyperscaler, DataCrunch (Verda) a neocloud — which is most of why the prices differ.
Where do these prices come from?
Amazon Web Services: Public on-demand price list for Linux, us-east-1. Instance price divided by GPU count. DataCrunch (Verda): Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.