Akash vs Massed Compute
4 GPUs in common. Akash is cheaper on 3, Massed Compute on 1; on average Massed Compute is 1% above Akash.
Prices collected 2026-09-18
Every GPU both price
| GPU | Akash | Massed Compute | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 NVIDIA B300 | $6.00 | $6.60 | Akash −9% | $7.85 |
| NVIDIA B200 | $5.00 | $5.43 | Akash −8% | $6.59 |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM | $2.71 | $2.81 | Akash −4% | $3.50 |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $1.71 | $1.37 | Massed Compute −20% | $1.79 |
Only one of them has it
Questions
Is Akash or Massed Compute cheaper?
On the 4 GPUs both price on 2026-09-18, Akash is cheaper on 3 and Massed Compute on 1. On average Massed Compute is 1% more expensive than Akash across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
What does one have that the other does not?
Akash alone prices H200, RTX 5090, RTX 4090, V100 16GB, T4, RTX 4080, RTX 3090; Massed Compute alone prices H200 NVL, H100 NVL, RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, L40S, L40, RTX 6000 Ada, RTX A6000, RTX A5000. They are different kinds of provider — Akash is a marketplace, Massed Compute a neocloud — which is most of why the prices differ.
Where do these prices come from?
Akash: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Massed Compute: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.