Akash vs Amazon Web Services
6 GPUs in common. Akash is cheaper on 6, Amazon Web Services on 0; on average Amazon Web Services is 303% above Akash.
Prices collected 2026-09-18
Every GPU both price
| GPU | Akash | Amazon Web Services | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 NVIDIA B200 | $5.00 | $14.24 | Akash −65% | $6.59 |
| NVIDIA H200 | $4.45 | $7.91 | Akash −44% | $4.45 |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM | $2.71 | $6.88 | Akash −61% | $3.50 |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $1.71 | $3.43 | Akash −50% | $1.79 |
| NVIDIA V100 16GB | $0.36 | $3.06 | Akash −88% | $0.79 |
| NVIDIA T4 | $0.15 | $0.98 | Akash −85% | $0.59 |
Only one of them has it
Questions
Is Akash or Amazon Web Services cheaper?
On the 6 GPUs both price on 2026-09-18, Akash is cheaper on 6 and Amazon Web Services on 0. On average Amazon Web Services is 303% more expensive than Akash across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
What does one have that the other does not?
Akash alone prices B300, RTX 5090, RTX 4090, RTX 4080, RTX 3090; Amazon Web Services alone prices V100 32GB, L40S, A100 40GB, A10G, L4. They are different kinds of provider — Akash is a marketplace, Amazon Web Services a hyperscaler — which is most of why the prices differ.
Where do these prices come from?
Akash: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Amazon Web Services: Public on-demand price list for Linux, us-east-1. Instance price divided by GPU count. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.