Akash vs Amazon Web Services
5 GPUs in common. Akash is cheaper on 5, Amazon Web Services on 0; on average Amazon Web Services is 420% above Akash.
Prices collected 2026-10-11
Every GPU both price
| GPU | Akash | Amazon Web Services | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 NVIDIA B200 | $5.00 | $14.24 | Akash −65% | $6.99 |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM | $2.73 | $6.88 | Akash −60% | $3.50 |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $1.50 | $3.43 | Akash −56% | $1.79 |
| NVIDIA V100 16GB | $0.25 | $3.06 | Akash −92% | $0.78 |
| NVIDIA T4 | $0.16 | $0.98 | Akash −84% | $0.59 |
Only one of them has it
Questions
Is Akash or Amazon Web Services cheaper?
On the 5 GPUs both price on 2026-10-11, Akash is cheaper on 5 and Amazon Web Services on 0. On average Amazon Web Services is 420% more expensive than Akash across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
What does one have that the other does not?
Akash alone prices B300, RTX 5090, RTX 4090, RTX 3090, RTX 4080; Amazon Web Services alone prices H200, V100 32GB, L40S, A100 40GB, A10G, L4. They are different kinds of provider — Akash is a marketplace, Amazon Web Services a hyperscaler — which is most of why the prices differ.
Where do these prices come from?
Akash: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Amazon Web Services: Public on-demand price list for Linux, us-east-1. Instance price divided by GPU count. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.