7 GPUs in common. Runcrate is cheaper on 0, Spheron on 7; on average Spheron is 17% below Runcrate.
Prices collected 2026-10-11
| GPU | Runcrate | Spheron | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $3.25 | $2.64 | Spheron −19% | $3.50 | |
| $2.85 | $2.35 | Spheron −18% | $2.23 | |
| $1.76 | $1.48 | Spheron −16% | $1.79 | |
| $1.26 | $0.78 | Spheron −38% | $0.89 | |
| $1.14 | $0.96 | Spheron −16% | $1.29 | |
| $0.85 | $0.78 | Spheron −8% | $0.81 | |
| $0.52 | $0.48 | Spheron −8% | $0.48 |
On the 7 GPUs both price on 2026-10-11, Runcrate is cheaper on 0 and Spheron on 7. On average Spheron is 17% cheaper than Runcrate across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
Runcrate alone prices V100 32GB, V100 16GB, RTX A5000, A100 40GB, A10, L4, L40, RTX A6000, RTX A4000; Spheron alone prices B200, H200, MI300X, GH200. They are different kinds of provider — Runcrate is a neocloud, Spheron a marketplace — which is most of why the prices differ.
Runcrate: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Spheron: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.