Massed Compute vs Spheron
6 GPUs in common. Massed Compute is cheaper on 3, Spheron on 3; on average Spheron is 18% above Massed Compute.
Prices collected 2026-10-11
Every GPU both price
| GPU | Massed Compute | Spheron | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 NVIDIA B200 | $5.43 | $11.06 | Massed Compute −51% | $6.99 |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM | $2.94 | $2.64 | Spheron −10% | $3.50 |
| NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell | $2.19 | $2.35 | Massed Compute −7% | $2.23 |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $1.37 | $1.48 | Massed Compute −8% | $1.79 |
| NVIDIA L40S | $0.97 | $0.96 | Spheron −1% | $1.29 |
| NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada | $0.79 | $0.78 | Spheron −1% | $0.89 |
Only one of them has it
Questions
Is Massed Compute or Spheron cheaper?
On the 6 GPUs both price on 2026-10-11, Massed Compute is cheaper on 3 and Spheron on 3. On average Spheron is 18% more expensive than Massed Compute across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
What does one have that the other does not?
Massed Compute alone prices B300, H200 NVL, H100 NVL, L40, RTX A6000, RTX A5000; Spheron alone prices H200, MI300X, GH200, RTX 5090, RTX 4090. They are different kinds of provider — Massed Compute is a neocloud, Spheron a marketplace — which is most of why the prices differ.
Where do these prices come from?
Massed Compute: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Spheron: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.