RRunyard Index
Runyard / GPU Index / Compare / Massed Compute vs Runcrate
Provider comparison

Massed Compute vs Runcrate

8 GPUs in common. Massed Compute is cheaper on 8, Runcrate on 0; on average Runcrate is 64% above Massed Compute.

Prices collected 2026-10-11

Massed Compute
12GPUs · -3.5% vs market
Runcrate
16GPUs · +71.1% vs market
In common
8
Kind
neocloud · neocloud

Every GPU both price

GPUMassed ComputeRuncrateDifferenceMarket
NVIDIANVIDIA H100 SXM$2.94$3.25Massed Compute −10%$3.50
NVIDIANVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell$2.19$2.85Massed Compute −23%$2.23
NVIDIANVIDIA A100 80GB$1.37$1.76Massed Compute −22%$1.79
NVIDIANVIDIA L40S$0.97$1.14Massed Compute −15%$1.29
NVIDIANVIDIA L40$0.86$1.14Massed Compute −25%$0.88
NVIDIANVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada$0.79$1.26Massed Compute −37%$0.89
NVIDIANVIDIA RTX A6000$0.57$0.65Massed Compute −12%$0.58
NVIDIANVIDIA RTX A5000$0.44$1.85Massed Compute −76%$0.26

Only one of them has it

Questions

Is Massed Compute or Runcrate cheaper?

On the 8 GPUs both price on 2026-10-11, Massed Compute is cheaper on 8 and Runcrate on 0. On average Runcrate is 64% more expensive than Massed Compute across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.

What does one have that the other does not?

Massed Compute alone prices B300, B200, H200 NVL, H100 NVL; Runcrate alone prices V100 32GB, V100 16GB, A100 40GB, A10, L4, RTX 5090, RTX 4090, RTX A4000.

Where do these prices come from?

Massed Compute: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Runcrate: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.