RRunyard Index
Runyard / GPU Index / Compare / Massed Compute vs Runcrate
Provider comparison

Massed Compute vs Runcrate

8 GPUs in common. Massed Compute is cheaper on 5, Runcrate on 2; on average Runcrate is 40% above Massed Compute.

Prices collected 2026-09-18

Massed Compute
12GPUs · -3.6% vs market
Runcrate
16GPUs · +72.5% vs market
In common
8
Kind
neocloud · neocloud

Every GPU both price

GPUMassed ComputeRuncrateDifferenceMarket
NVIDIANVIDIA H100 SXM$2.81$2.75Runcrate −2%$3.50
NVIDIANVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell$2.19$2.41Massed Compute −9%$2.05
NVIDIANVIDIA A100 80GB$1.37$1.49Massed Compute −8%$1.79
NVIDIANVIDIA L40S$0.97$0.97same$1.47
NVIDIANVIDIA L40$0.86$0.97Massed Compute −11%$0.86
NVIDIANVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada$0.79$1.07Massed Compute −26%$0.82
NVIDIANVIDIA RTX A6000$0.57$0.55Runcrate −4%$0.56
NVIDIANVIDIA RTX A5000$0.44$1.56Massed Compute −72%$0.27

Only one of them has it

Only Massed ComputeB300, B200, H200 NVL, H100 NVL

Questions

Is Massed Compute or Runcrate cheaper?

On the 8 GPUs both price on 2026-09-18, Massed Compute is cheaper on 5 and Runcrate on 2, with 1 tied. On average Runcrate is 40% more expensive than Massed Compute across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.

What does one have that the other does not?

Massed Compute alone prices B300, B200, H200 NVL, H100 NVL; Runcrate alone prices H200, V100 32GB, V100 16GB, A100 40GB, A10, L4, RTX A4000, RTX 4090.

Where do these prices come from?

Massed Compute: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Runcrate: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.