6 GPUs in common. Massed Compute is cheaper on 6, Oracle Cloud on 0; on average Oracle Cloud is 183% above Massed Compute.
Prices collected 2026-09-18
| GPU | Massed Compute | Oracle Cloud | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $6.60 | $15.00 | Massed Compute −56% | $7.85 | |
| $5.43 | $14.00 | Massed Compute −61% | $6.59 | |
| $2.81 | $10.00 | Massed Compute −72% | $3.50 | |
| $2.19 | $4.50 | Massed Compute −51% | $2.05 | |
| $1.37 | $4.00 | Massed Compute −66% | $1.79 | |
| $0.97 | $3.50 | Massed Compute −72% | $1.47 |
On the 6 GPUs both price on 2026-09-18, Massed Compute is cheaper on 6 and Oracle Cloud on 0. On average Oracle Cloud is 183% more expensive than Massed Compute across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
Massed Compute alone prices H200 NVL, H100 NVL, L40, RTX 6000 Ada, RTX A6000, RTX A5000; Oracle Cloud alone prices H200, MI355X, MI300X, A100 40GB, V100 16GB, A10. They are different kinds of provider — Massed Compute is a neocloud, Oracle Cloud a hyperscaler — which is most of why the prices differ.
Massed Compute: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Oracle Cloud: OCI's public price-list API (the cost estimator's feed), pay-as-you-go, per GPU-hour as listed. One price worldwide. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.