RRunyard Index
Runyard / GPU Index / Compare / H200 vs MI325X
NVIDIAAMD
Rental price comparison

H200 vs MI325X

The MI325X rents for 28% less per hour today — $3.20 against $4.45 — with 256 GB against 141 GB of memory.

Prices collected 2026-09-18 · 1 providers price both

H200MI325X
$0.00$1.25$2.50$3.75$5.00Sep 12Sep 14Sep 16Sep 18

Index median per GPU-hour, on-demand, per snapshot.

Side by side

H200MI325X
Median rental, per GPU-hour$4.45$3.20
Cheapest listing$2.00$2.59
Per month at 720 h$3,204$2,300
Providers pricing it352
Memory141 GB HBM3e256 GB HBM3e
Memory bandwidth4,800 GB/s6,000 GB/s
GB of memory per $/hr31.780.1
ArchitectureHopperCDNA 3
ClassDatacenterDatacenter
Released2023-112024-10

Same provider, both GPUs

The cleanest comparison: 1 provider price both cards, so the difference is the GPU and nothing else. The H200 is cheaper at 0 of them.

ProviderH200MI325XMI325X premium
DigitalOcean GPU Droplets$4.47$3.80-15%

What each one runs, and what a million tokens costs

Weights + KV cache at 8K context + overhead against 90% of each card's memory. Where a model needs more than one card the cell says how many and prices the set at today's median. $/M tokens is the hourly median divided by estimated single-stream output, from memory bandwidth — an estimate for ranking, not a benchmark.

ModelBitsH200MI325X
Kimi K34-bit13× GPU$57.85/hr7× GPU$22.37/hr
Kimi K316-bit45× GPU$200.25/hr25× GPU$79.88/hr
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash4-bit3× GPU$13.35/hr2× GPU$6.39/hr
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash16-bit9× GPU$40.05/hr5× GPU$15.98/hr
Llama 4 Maverick4-bit2× GPU$8.90/hr228 GB~502 tok/s · $1.77/M
Llama 4 Maverick16-bit7× GPU$31.15/hr4× GPU$12.78/hr
gpt-oss-120b4-bit67.9 GB~1339 tok/s · $0.92/M67.9 GB~1673 tok/s · $0.53/M
gpt-oss-120b16-bit2× GPU$8.90/hr2× GPU$6.39/hr
Llama 3.1 70B4-bit44.5 GB~98 tok/s · $12.61/M44.5 GB~122 tok/s · $7.27/M
Llama 3.1 70B16-bit2× GPU$8.90/hr145.1 GB~34 tok/s · $26.1/M
Gemma 4 31B4-bit21.2 GB~220 tok/s · $5.62/M21.2 GB~275 tok/s · $3.23/M
Gemma 4 31B16-bit65.7 GB~62 tok/s · $19.94/M65.7 GB~77 tok/s · $11.53/M
Qwen3 Coder 30B-A3B4-bit19 GB~2069 tok/s · $0.6/M19 GB~2586 tok/s · $0.34/M
Qwen3 Coder 30B-A3B16-bit62.9 GB~582 tok/s · $2.12/M62.9 GB~727 tok/s · $1.22/M
Qwen3.8 27B4-bit18.7 GB~253 tok/s · $4.89/M18.7 GB~316 tok/s · $2.81/M
Qwen3.8 27B16-bit57.6 GB~71 tok/s · $17.41/M57.6 GB~89 tok/s · $9.97/M
gpt-oss-20b4-bit13.7 GB~1896 tok/s · $0.65/M13.7 GB~2370 tok/s · $0.37/M
gpt-oss-20b16-bit43.9 GB~533 tok/s · $2.32/M43.9 GB~667 tok/s · $1.33/M
Llama 3.1 8B4-bit6.9 GB~853 tok/s · $1.45/M6.9 GB~1067 tok/s · $0.83/M
Llama 3.1 8B16-bit18.4 GB~240 tok/s · $5.15/M18.4 GB~300 tok/s · $2.96/M

Buy or rent?

Hours of renting at today's median that add up to the card's approximate list price. List prices are typical quoted figures, not tracked, and do not include the server, power or the person to run it — so the break-even is a floor, not a verdict.

H200
7,191 h≈ 10 months at ~$32,000 list
MI325X
no list price on file

Questions

Is the H200 or the MI325X cheaper to rent?

On 2026-09-18 the H200 has a market median of $4.45 per GPU-hour across 35 providers and the MI325X $3.19 across 2, so the MI325X is 28% cheaper per hour. Among the 1 providers that price both, the H200 is cheaper at 0 and the MI325X at 1. Per hour is only half the answer — the table below prices a whole model on each.

Which should I rent for a 70B model?

At 4-bit, Llama 3.1 70B needs about 44.5 GB. On the H200 that is one card at $4.45/hr; on the MI325X one card at $3.20/hr. Estimated single-stream decode is ~98 vs ~122 tokens per second, from memory bandwidth.

What is the real difference between them?

141 GB HBM3e at 4,800 GB/s (Hopper) against 256 GB HBM3e at 6,000 GB/s (CDNA 3). Memory decides what fits; bandwidth decides how fast it generates, because each token streams the active weights once. Compute matters for prompt processing and training, not for how fast text appears.

See every provider's price for either card.
MI325X providers →