12 GPUs in common. GPU.ai is cheaper on 10, Runcrate on 2; on average Runcrate is 104% above GPU.ai.
Prices collected 2026-10-11
| GPU | GPU.ai | Runcrate | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $3.73 | $3.25 | Runcrate −13% | $3.50 | |
| $1.84 | $2.85 | GPU.ai −35% | $2.23 | |
| $1.16 | $1.76 | GPU.ai −34% | $1.79 | |
| $0.83 | $0.85 | GPU.ai −2% | $0.81 | |
| $0.78 | $1.14 | GPU.ai −32% | $0.88 | |
| $0.70 | $1.14 | GPU.ai −39% | $1.29 | |
| $0.65 | $1.26 | GPU.ai −48% | $0.89 | |
| $0.62 | $0.52 | Runcrate −15% | $0.48 | |
| $0.46 | $1.23 | GPU.ai −63% | $0.79 | |
| $0.40 | $0.65 | GPU.ai −38% | $0.58 | |
| $0.24 | $1.85 | GPU.ai −87% | $0.26 | |
| $0.12 | $0.20 | GPU.ai −40% | $0.16 |
On the 12 GPUs both price on 2026-10-11, GPU.ai is cheaper on 10 and Runcrate on 2. On average Runcrate is 104% more expensive than GPU.ai across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
GPU.ai alone prices B300, B200, H200, H200 NVL, H100 PCIe, H100 NVL, A40, RTX 4080, RTX 5080, RTX 3090; Runcrate alone prices V100 32GB, V100 16GB, A100 40GB, A10. They are different kinds of provider — GPU.ai is a marketplace, Runcrate a neocloud — which is most of why the prices differ.
GPU.ai: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Runcrate: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.