12 GPUs in common. GPU.ai is cheaper on 11, Runcrate on 1; on average Runcrate is 77% above GPU.ai.
Prices collected 2026-09-18
| GPU | GPU.ai | Runcrate | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $3.69 | $2.75 | Runcrate −25% | $3.50 | |
| $3.59 | $4.40 | GPU.ai −18% | $4.45 | |
| $1.84 | $2.41 | GPU.ai −24% | $2.05 | |
| $1.21 | $1.49 | GPU.ai −19% | $1.79 | |
| $0.89 | $1.54 | GPU.ai −42% | $1.48 | |
| $0.80 | $0.97 | GPU.ai −18% | $1.47 | |
| $0.78 | $0.97 | GPU.ai −20% | $0.86 | |
| $0.65 | $1.07 | GPU.ai −39% | $0.82 | |
| $0.60 | $0.66 | GPU.ai −9% | $0.60 | |
| $0.44 | $0.55 | GPU.ai −21% | $0.56 | |
| $0.38 | $1.05 | GPU.ai −64% | $0.80 | |
| $0.27 | $1.56 | GPU.ai −83% | $0.27 |
On the 12 GPUs both price on 2026-09-18, GPU.ai is cheaper on 11 and Runcrate on 1. On average Runcrate is 77% more expensive than GPU.ai across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
GPU.ai alone prices B200, H200 NVL, H100 NVL, H100 PCIe, RTX 5090, RTX 5080, A40, RTX 4080, RTX 3090; Runcrate alone prices V100 32GB, V100 16GB, A10, RTX A4000. They are different kinds of provider — GPU.ai is a marketplace, Runcrate a neocloud — which is most of why the prices differ.
GPU.ai: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Runcrate: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.