12 GPUs in common. GPU.ai is cheaper on 8, Massed Compute on 4; on average Massed Compute is 15% above GPU.ai.
Prices collected 2026-10-11
| GPU | GPU.ai | Massed Compute | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $8.99 | $6.60 | Massed Compute −27% | $8.00 | |
| $7.56 | $5.43 | Massed Compute −28% | $6.99 | |
| $4.14 | $3.72 | Massed Compute −10% | $3.79 | |
| $3.73 | $2.94 | Massed Compute −21% | $3.50 | |
| $2.23 | $3.02 | GPU.ai −26% | $2.80 | |
| $1.84 | $2.19 | GPU.ai −16% | $2.23 | |
| $1.16 | $1.37 | GPU.ai −15% | $1.79 | |
| $0.78 | $0.86 | GPU.ai −9% | $0.88 | |
| $0.70 | $0.97 | GPU.ai −28% | $1.29 | |
| $0.65 | $0.79 | GPU.ai −18% | $0.89 | |
| $0.40 | $0.57 | GPU.ai −30% | $0.58 | |
| $0.24 | $0.44 | GPU.ai −45% | $0.26 |
On the 12 GPUs both price on 2026-10-11, GPU.ai is cheaper on 8 and Massed Compute on 4. On average Massed Compute is 15% more expensive than GPU.ai across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
GPU.ai alone prices H200, H100 PCIe, RTX 5090, RTX 4090, A40, L4, RTX 4080, RTX 5080, RTX 3090, RTX A4000; Massed Compute alone prices nothing the other lacks. They are different kinds of provider — GPU.ai is a marketplace, Massed Compute a neocloud — which is most of why the prices differ.
GPU.ai: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Massed Compute: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.