11 GPUs in common. GPU.ai is cheaper on 8, Massed Compute on 3; on average Massed Compute is 12% above GPU.ai.
Prices collected 2026-09-18
| GPU | GPU.ai | Massed Compute | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $7.78 | $5.43 | Massed Compute −30% | $6.59 | |
| $3.69 | $2.81 | Massed Compute −24% | $3.50 | |
| $3.46 | $3.72 | GPU.ai −7% | $3.72 | |
| $3.05 | $3.02 | Massed Compute −1% | $3.03 | |
| $1.84 | $2.19 | GPU.ai −16% | $2.05 | |
| $1.21 | $1.37 | GPU.ai −11% | $1.79 | |
| $0.80 | $0.97 | GPU.ai −18% | $1.47 | |
| $0.78 | $0.86 | GPU.ai −9% | $0.86 | |
| $0.65 | $0.79 | GPU.ai −18% | $0.82 | |
| $0.44 | $0.57 | GPU.ai −24% | $0.56 | |
| $0.27 | $0.44 | GPU.ai −39% | $0.27 |
On the 11 GPUs both price on 2026-09-18, GPU.ai is cheaper on 8 and Massed Compute on 3. On average Massed Compute is 12% more expensive than GPU.ai across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
GPU.ai alone prices H200, H100 PCIe, A100 40GB, RTX 5090, RTX 5080, RTX 4090, A40, L4, RTX 4080, RTX 3090; Massed Compute alone prices B300. They are different kinds of provider — GPU.ai is a marketplace, Massed Compute a neocloud — which is most of why the prices differ.
GPU.ai: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Massed Compute: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.