8 GPUs in common. Cerebrium is cheaper on 2, GPU.ai on 6; on average GPU.ai is 27% below Cerebrium.
Prices collected 2026-09-18
| GPU | Cerebrium | GPU.ai | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $6.01 | $7.78 | Cerebrium −23% | $6.59 | |
| $4.20 | $3.59 | GPU.ai −14% | $4.45 | |
| $3.40 | $3.69 | Cerebrium −8% | $3.50 | |
| $2.50 | $1.84 | GPU.ai −26% | $2.05 | |
| $2.10 | $1.21 | GPU.ai −42% | $1.79 | |
| $2.00 | $0.89 | GPU.ai −55% | $1.48 | |
| $1.95 | $0.80 | GPU.ai −59% | $1.47 | |
| $0.80 | $0.38 | GPU.ai −52% | $0.80 |
On the 8 GPUs both price on 2026-09-18, Cerebrium is cheaper on 2 and GPU.ai on 6. On average GPU.ai is 27% cheaper than Cerebrium across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
Cerebrium alone prices A10, T4; GPU.ai alone prices H200 NVL, H100 NVL, H100 PCIe, L40, RTX 5090, RTX 5080, RTX 6000 Ada, RTX 4090, A40, RTX A6000, RTX 4080, RTX 3090, RTX A5000. They are different kinds of provider — Cerebrium is a neocloud, GPU.ai a marketplace — which is most of why the prices differ.
Cerebrium: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. GPU.ai: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.