7 GPUs in common. Beam is cheaper on 5, Runcrate on 2; on average Runcrate is 35% above Beam.
Prices collected 2026-09-18
| GPU | Beam | Runcrate | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $3.50 | $2.75 | Runcrate −21% | $3.50 | |
| $2.09 | $4.40 | Beam −53% | $4.45 | |
| $1.36 | $1.49 | Beam −9% | $1.79 | |
| $1.09 | $2.41 | Beam −55% | $2.05 | |
| $0.76 | $0.97 | Beam −22% | $1.47 | |
| $0.69 | $0.66 | Runcrate −4% | $0.60 | |
| $0.54 | $0.55 | Beam −2% | $0.56 |
On the 7 GPUs both price on 2026-09-18, Beam is cheaper on 5 and Runcrate on 2. On average Runcrate is 35% more expensive than Beam across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
Beam alone prices B200, H100 PCIe, RTX 5090; Runcrate alone prices V100 32GB, V100 16GB, RTX A5000, A100 40GB, A10, RTX 6000 Ada, L4, L40, RTX A4000.
Beam: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Runcrate: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.