10 GPUs in common. Beam is cheaper on 5, GPU.ai on 5; on average GPU.ai is 23% above Beam.
Prices collected 2026-10-11
| GPU | Beam | GPU.ai | Difference | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $4.11 | $7.56 | Beam −46% | $6.99 | |
| $3.50 | $3.73 | Beam −6% | $3.50 | |
| $2.09 | $4.44 | Beam −53% | $4.50 | |
| $1.83 | $2.29 | Beam −20% | $2.29 | |
| $1.36 | $1.16 | GPU.ai −15% | $1.79 | |
| $1.09 | $1.84 | Beam −41% | $2.23 | |
| $0.91 | $0.83 | GPU.ai −8% | $0.81 | |
| $0.76 | $0.70 | GPU.ai −8% | $1.29 | |
| $0.69 | $0.62 | GPU.ai −11% | $0.48 | |
| $0.54 | $0.40 | GPU.ai −26% | $0.58 |
On the 10 GPUs both price on 2026-10-11, Beam is cheaper on 5 and GPU.ai on 5. On average GPU.ai is 23% more expensive than Beam across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.
Beam alone prices nothing the other lacks; GPU.ai alone prices B300, H200 NVL, H100 NVL, L40, RTX 6000 Ada, A40, L4, RTX 4080, RTX 5080, RTX A5000, RTX 3090, RTX A4000. They are different kinds of provider — Beam is a neocloud, GPU.ai a marketplace — which is most of why the prices differ.
Beam: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. GPU.ai: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.