RRunyard Index
Runyard / GPU Index / Compare / Amazon Web Services vs Runcrate
Provider comparison

Amazon Web Services vs Runcrate

8 GPUs in common. Amazon Web Services is cheaper on 0, Runcrate on 8; on average Runcrate is 45% below Amazon Web Services.

Prices collected 2026-09-18

Amazon Web Services
11GPUs · +99.9% vs market
Runcrate
16GPUs · +72.5% vs market
In common
8
Kind
hyperscaler · neocloud

Every GPU both price

GPUAmazon Web ServicesRuncrateDifferenceMarket
NVIDIANVIDIA H200$7.91$4.40Runcrate −44%$4.45
NVIDIANVIDIA H100 SXM$6.88$2.75Runcrate −60%$3.50
NVIDIANVIDIA V100 32GB$3.90$2.57Runcrate −34%$2.66
NVIDIANVIDIA A100 80GB$3.43$1.49Runcrate −57%$1.79
NVIDIANVIDIA L40S$3.39$0.97Runcrate −71%$1.47
NVIDIANVIDIA V100 16GB$3.06$2.57Runcrate −16%$0.79
NVIDIANVIDIA A100 40GB$2.74$1.54Runcrate −44%$1.48
NVIDIANVIDIA L4$1.60$1.05Runcrate −35%$0.80

Only one of them has it

Questions

Is Amazon Web Services or Runcrate cheaper?

On the 8 GPUs both price on 2026-09-18, Amazon Web Services is cheaper on 0 and Runcrate on 8. On average Runcrate is 45% cheaper than Amazon Web Services across those GPUs. The table shows each one; the gap is rarely uniform.

What does one have that the other does not?

Amazon Web Services alone prices B200, A10G, T4; Runcrate alone prices RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, RTX A5000, A10, RTX 6000 Ada, L40, RTX A4000, RTX 4090, RTX A6000. They are different kinds of provider — Amazon Web Services is a hyperscaler, Runcrate a neocloud — which is most of why the prices differ.

Where do these prices come from?

Amazon Web Services: Public on-demand price list for Linux, us-east-1. Instance price divided by GPU count. Runcrate: Public pricing page, parsed. Per-GPU price is the listed per-GPU rate, or the node price divided by GPU count. Prices near reserved, committed or contract terms are discarded; anything outside a plausible range for the GPU is discarded. Both are read every six hours; nothing is estimated.